<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eMyth &#8230; Great Book.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.curiouspursuit.com/2009/02/emyth-great-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.curiouspursuit.com/2009/02/emyth-great-book/</link>
	<description>life::you&#60;br&#62;life::happiness()&#60;br&#62;life::productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouspursuit.com/2009/02/emyth-great-book/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouspursuit.com/?p=56#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Martin:  Interesting juxtaposition.  I think it probably depends a little bit on the current stage in your company or product &quot;life cycle&quot;.  I do think E-Myth is still flexible though too.  I don&#039;t think the idea is a &quot;set it and forget&quot; mindset.  The idea is to try to boil process down to it&#039;s simplest and most effective.  Once you have baselines ... you can test other ways to see what works best.

I also think there is ALWAYS an initial frenzy when starting a new project (or product or whatever).  That&#039;s unavoidable and better managed by a 37signals paradigm.  But I think eventually you have to get down to process management if you&#039;re going to keep your sanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin:  Interesting juxtaposition.  I think it probably depends a little bit on the current stage in your company or product &#8220;life cycle&#8221;.  I do think E-Myth is still flexible though too.  I don&#8217;t think the idea is a &#8220;set it and forget&#8221; mindset.  The idea is to try to boil process down to it&#8217;s simplest and most effective.  Once you have baselines &#8230; you can test other ways to see what works best.</p>
<p>I also think there is ALWAYS an initial frenzy when starting a new project (or product or whatever).  That&#8217;s unavoidable and better managed by a 37signals paradigm.  But I think eventually you have to get down to process management if you&#8217;re going to keep your sanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.curiouspursuit.com/2009/02/emyth-great-book/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiouspursuit.com/?p=56#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Interested in your thoughts.. Does 37signals or E-myth have the right philosophy for business start-ups today? www.purlem.com/blog/?p=38</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Interested in your thoughts.. Does 37signals or E-myth have the right philosophy for business start-ups today? <a href="http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=38" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=38');" rel="nofollow">http://www.purlem.com/blog/?p=38</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
